Root ML, Orien WP, Weed JN: Biomechanical Examination of the Foot, Vol 1, Clinical Biomechanics Corp, Los Angeles, 1971..
Menz HB: Clinical measurement of the lower extremity: where to from here. ?Australas J Podiatr Med 31::95. ,1997. .
Menz HB: Clinical hindfoot measurements: a critical review of the literature. .Foot 5::57. ,1995. .
McPoil TG, Hunt GC: Evaluation and management of foot and ankle disorders: present problems and future directions. .J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 21::381. ,1995. .
Boone DC, Azen SP, Lin CM, et al: Reliability of goniometric measurements. .Phys Ther 58::1355. ,1978. .
Bovens A, Van Baak M, Vrencken J, et al: Variability and reliability of joint measurements. .Am J Sports Med 18::58. ,1990. .
Baldwin EB, Graebner JE: A comparison of K-square and tractograph. .JAPA 72::629. ,1982. .
Muwanga CL, Dove AF, Plant GR: The measurement of the ankle movements: a new method. .Injury 16::312. ,1985. .
Haas M: Statistical methodology for reliability studies. .J Manipulative Physiol Ther 14::119. ,1991. .
Lohman KN, Harry ER, Walter PS, et al: Static measurement of tibia vara: reliability and effect of lower extremity position. .Phys Ther 67::198. ,1987. .
Smith-Oricchio K, Harris BA: Interrater reliability of subtalar neutral, calcaneal inversion and eversion. .J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 12::10. ,1990. .
Aström M, Arvidson T: Alignment and joint motion in the normal foot. .J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 22::217. ,1995. .
Menz HB, Keenan A-M: Reliability of two instruments in the measurements of closed chain subtalar joint positions. .Foot 7::194. ,1997. .
Sell KE, Todd MV, Worrell TW, et al: Two measurement techniques for assessing subtalar joint position: a reliability study. .J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 19::162. ,1994. .
Pandya S, Florence JM, King WM, et al: Reliability of goniometric measurements in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. .Phys Ther 65::1339. ,1985. .
Diamond JE, Michael MJ, Dellitto A, et al: Reliability of a diabetic foot evaluation. .Phys Ther 69::797. ,1989. .
Elveru RA, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL: Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting: subtalar and ankle joint measurements. .Phys Ther 68::672. ,1988. .
Ashton BB, Pickles B, Roll JW: Reliability of goniometric measurements of hip motion in spastic cerebral palsy. .Dev Med Child Neurol 20::87. ,1978. .
Bartlett MD, Wolf LS, Shurtleff DB, et al: Hip flexion contractures: a comparison of measurement methods. .Arch Phys Med Rehabil 66::620. ,1985. .
Ekstrand J, Wiktorsson M, Öberg B, et al: Lower extremity goniometric measurements: a study to determine their reliability. .Arch Phys Med Rehabil 63::171. ,1982. .
Payne C, Richardson M: Changes in measurement of neutral and relaxed calcaneal stance positions with experience. .Foot 10::81. ,2000. .
Freeman AC: A study of the intertester and intratester reliability in the measurement of resting calcaneal stance position and neutral calcaneal stance position. .Aust Podiatry (June)::10. ,1990. . Cited by: Payne C, Richardson M: Changes in measurement of neutral and relaxed calcaneal stance positions with experience. Foot 10: 81, 2000.
Eliasziw M, Young SL, Woodbury MG, et al: Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. .Phys Ther 74::777. ,1994. .
Schrout PE, Fleiss JL: Intraclass correlation: uses in assessing rater reliability. .Psychol Bull 86::420. ,1979. .
Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. .Biometrics 2::110. ,1977. .
Pierrynowski MR, Smith SB, Mlynarczyk JH: Proficiency of foot care specialists to place the rearfoot at subtalar neutral. .JAPMA 86::217. ,1996. .
The reliability of biomechanical measurements of the lower extremities, as they are commonly used in podiatric practice, was quantified by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). This was done not only to evaluate interrater and intrarater reliability but also to provide an estimate for the accuracy of the measurements. The measurement protocol involved 30 asymptomatic subjects and five raters of varying experience. Each subject was measured twice by the same rater, with the retest immediately following the test. The study demonstrated that the interrater ICCs were quite low (≤0.51), except for the measurements of relaxed calcaneal stance position and forefoot varus (both 0.61 and 0.62 for left and right, respectively). However, the intrarater ICCs were relatively high (>0.8) for most raters and measurement variables. Measurement accuracy was moderate between raters. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 92(6): 317-326, 2002)
The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or any other representative or department of the US government.