Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Wunderlich RP, et al: Predictive value of foot pressure assessment as part of a population-based diabetes disease management program. .Diabetes Care26::1069. ,2003. .12663575)| false
Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Wunderlich RP, et al: Diabetic foot syndrome: evaluating the prevalence and incidence of foot pathology in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites from a diabetes disease management cohort. .Diabetes Care26::1435. ,2003. .
Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Wunderlich RP, et al: Diabetic foot syndrome: evaluating the prevalence and incidence of foot pathology in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites from a diabetes disease management cohort. .Diabetes Care26::1435. ,2003. .12716801)| false
Armstrong DG, Stacpoole-Shea S, Nguyen HC, et al: Lengthening of the Achilles tendon in diabetic patients who are at high risk for ulceration of the foot. .J Bone Joint Surg Am81::535. ,1999. .10225799)| false
Skin Temperatures as a One-time Screening Tool Do Not Predict Future Diabetic Foot Complications
David G. Armstrong
David G. ArmstrongDiabetex Research Group, Baltimore, MD. Department of Surgery, Podiatry Section, Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tucson. Department of Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, England.
This prospective longitudinal study assessed whether baseline mean skin temperature measurements are useful in predicting the most common foot-related complications of diabetes mellitus. We evaluated the mean of baseline skin temperatures taken bilaterally from six plantar sites in 1,588 patients with diabetes. There was no difference in skin temperature based on neuropathy, foot laterality, or foot risk category or between people with and without foot deformity and elevated plantar foot pressure. Whereas people with Charcot’s arthropathy had slightly but significantly higher mean temperatures (84.8° ± 3.5° F versus 82.5° ± 4.7° F), this was not true for those who developed ulcers or infections or who underwent amputations. The presence of vascular disease was not associated with lower skin temperatures. Mexican Americans (83.0° ± 4.6° F) and blacks (83.6° ± 4.5° F) had higher mean skin temperatures at baseline than did non-Hispanic whites (81.8° ± 4.6° F). Baseline measurement of nonfocal mean skin temperatures is not an effective means of screening people for future events. Regular assessment of skin temperatures, using the contralateral site as a physiologic control, may be a better use of this technology. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 93(6): 443-447, 2003)
Corresponding author: Lawrence A. Lavery, DPM, MPH, 702 Highland Spring Ln, Georgetown, TX 78628 (e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org).