Yuan-Innes MJ, Temple CL, Lacey MS: Vacuum-assisted wound closure: a new approach to spinal wounds with exposed hardware. .Spine 26::E30. ,2001. .
Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, et al: Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. .Ann Plast Surg 38::553. ,1997. .
McCallon SK, Knight CA, Valiulus JP, et al: Vacuum-assisted closure versus saline-moistened gauze in the healing of postoperative diabetic foot wounds. .Ostomy Wound Manage 46::28. ,2000. .
Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Abu-Rumman P, et al: Outcomes of subatmospheric pressure dressing therapy on wounds of the diabetic foot. .Ostomy Wound Manage 48::64. ,2002. .
Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC: Nonsurgical modalities to enhance healing and care of soft tissue wounds. .J South Orthop Assoc 6::279. ,1997. .
Greer SE, Duthie E, Cartolano B, et al: Techniques for applying subatmospheric pressure dressing to wounds in difficult regions of anatomy. .J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 26::250. ,1999. .
Armstrong DG, Short B, Nixon BP, et al: Technique for fabrication of an “instant total-contact cast” for treatment of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. .JAPMA 92::405. ,2002. .
Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Kimbriel HR, et al: Activity patterns of patients with diabetic foot ulceration: patients with active ulceration may not adhere to a standard pressure off-loading regimen. .Diabetes Care 26::2595. ,2003. .
Boulton AJ, Armstrong DG: Trials in neuropathic diabetic foot ulceration: time for a paradigm shift?. Diabetes Care 26::2689. ,2003. .
Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Harkless LB: Validation of a diabetic wound classification system: the contribution of depth, infection, and ischemia to risk of amputation. .Diabetes Care 21::855. ,1998. .
Lavery LA, Vela SA, Lavery DC, et al: Reducing dynamic foot pressures in high-risk diabetic subjects with foot ulcerations: a comparison of treatments. .Diabetes Care 19::818. ,1996. .
Lavery LA, Vela SA, Lavery DC, et al: Total contact casts: pressure reduction at ulcer sites and the effect on the contralateral foot. .Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78::1268. ,1997. .
Lavery LA, Vela SA, Fleischli JG, et al: Reducing plantar pressure in the neuropathic foot: a comparison of footwear. .Diabetes Care 20::1706. ,1997. .
This study evaluated changes in pressure imparted to diabetic foot wounds using a novel negative pressure bridging technique coupled with a robust removable cast walker. Ten patients had plantar pressures assessed with and without a bridged negative pressure dressing on the foot. Off-loading was accomplished with a pressure-relief walker. Plantar pressures were recorded using two pressure-measurement systems. The location and value of peak focal pressure (taken from six midgait steps) were recorded at the site of ulceration. Paired analysis revealed a large difference (mean ± SD, 74.6% ± 6.0%) between baseline barefoot pressure and pressure within the pressure-relief walker (mean ± SD, 939.1 ± 195.1 versus 235.7 ± 66.1 kPa). There was a mean ± SD 9.9% ± 5.6% higher pressure in the combination device compared with the pressure-relief walker alone (mean ± SD, 258.0 ± 69.7 versus 235.7 ± 66.1 kPa). This difference was only 2% of the initial barefoot pressure imparted to the wound. A modified negative pressure dressing coupled with a robust removable cast walker may not impart undue additional stress to the plantar aspect of the foot and may allow patients to retain some degree of freedom (and a potentially reduced length of hospital stay) while still allowing for the beneficial effects of negative pressure wound therapy and sufficient off-loading. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 94(5): 456–460, 2004)