• 1

    Nester CJ, Findlow A, Bowker P: Scientific approach to the axis of rotation at the midtarsal joint. .JAPMA 91::68. ,2001. .

  • 2

    Keenan AM: “Understanding Midtarsal Joint Function: Fact and Fallacy,” in Conference Book of Proceedings for the 17th Australian Podiatry Conference, ed by AM Keenan, HB Menz, p 107, Australian Podiatry Council, Melbourne. ,1996. .

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Payne CB: The role of theory in understanding the midtarsal joint. .JAPMA 90::377. ,2000. .

  • 4

    Sims DS, Cavanagh PR: “Selected Foot Mechanics Related to the Prescription of Foot Orthoses,” in Disorders of the Foot and Ankle: Medical and Surgical Management, Vol 1, ed by MH Jahss, p 469, WB Saunders, Philadelphia. ,1991. .

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Van Langelaan EJ: A kinematical analysis of the tarsal joints: an X-ray photogrammetric study. .Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 204::1. ,1983. .

  • 6

    Benink RJ: The constraint-mechanism of the human tarsus: a roentgenological experimental study. .Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 215::1. ,1985. .

  • 7

    Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, et al: ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion: part I. Ankle, hip, and spine. .J Biomech 35::543. ,2002. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Lundberg A: Kinematics of the ankle and foot: in vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetry. .Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 233::1. ,1989. .

  • 9

    Wu G, Cavanagh PR: ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. .J Biomech 28::1257. ,1995. .

  • 10

    Valmassy RL: “Pathomechanics of Lower Extremity Function,” in Clinical Biomechanics of the Lower Extremity, ed by RL Valmassy, p 65, CV Mosby, St Louis. ,1997. .

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Hicks JH: The mechanics of the foot. .J Anat 87::345. ,1953. .

  • 12

    Hunt AE, Smith RM, Torode M: Extrinsic muscle activity, foot motion and ankle joint moments during the stance phase of walking. .Foot Ankle Int 22::31. ,2001. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Rattanaprasert U, Smith R, Sullivan M, et al: Three-dimensional kinematics of the forefoot, rearfoot, and leg without the function of tibialis posterior in comparison with normals during stance phase of walking. .Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 14::14. ,1999. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Kidder SM, Abuzzahab FS Jr, Harris GF, et al: A system for the analysis of foot and ankle kinematics during gait. .IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 4::25. ,1996. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Clinical and Experimental Models of the Midtarsal Joint

Proposed Terms of Reference and Associated Terminology

Christopher J. Nester Centre for Rehabilitation and Human Performance Research, University of Salford, Salford, England.

Search for other papers by Christopher J. Nester in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
and
Andrew H. Findlow Centre for Rehabilitation and Human Performance Research, University of Salford, Salford, England.

Search for other papers by Andrew H. Findlow in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BSc(Hon)

Recent debate and literature have provided impetus to the growing body of thought that we should not model the midtarsal joint as having two simultaneous axes of rotation but as having a single instantaneous axis of rotation. Building on this concept, we present new reference terminology and propose that descriptions of midtarsal joint kinetics and kinematics relate to moments and motion in the cardinal body planes as defined by the x-, y-, and z-axes of the local reference system of the calcaneus. This replaces the existing terminology that describes the oblique and longitudinal axes for the midtarsal joint. The purpose of the new terms of reference and terminology is to aid in the communication of ideas and concepts regarding the biomechanics of the midtarsal joint among clinicians and between researchers and clinicians. It will also allow integration of the midtarsal joint into the emerging biomechanical model of the lower limb, promote consistency in discussions of the joint, and ease understanding of the interrelationships between the kinetics and the kinematics of the articulations in the foot and lower limb and their relationship to pathology and clinical practice. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 96(1): 24–31, 2006)

Corresponding author: Christopher J. Nester, PhD, Centre for Rehabilitation and Human Performance Research, University of Salford, Brian Blatchford Bldg, Salford M6 6PU, England.
Save