Huson A: Een ontleedkundig-functioneel onderzoek van de voetwortel. Leiden, Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden. ,1961. .
Benink RJ: The constraint mechanism of the human tarsus. .Acta Orthop Scand 56:: S215,49. ,1985. .
Van Langelaan EJ: A kinematic analysis of the tarsal joints. .Acta Orthop Scand 54::S204. , 291983. .
Lundberg A, Svensson OK, Bylund C, et al: Kinematics of the ankle foot complex. 3. Influence of leg rotation. .Foot Ankle Int 9::304. ,1989. .
Wolf P, Stacoff A, Stuessi E: Modelling of the passive mobility in human tarsal gears: implications from the literature. .Foot 14::23. ,2004. .
Siegler S, Udupa JK, RIngleb SI, et al: Mechanics of the ankle and subtalar joints revealed through a 3d quasi-static stress MRI technique. .J Biomech 38::567. ,2005. .
Wolf P, Luechinger R, Boesiger P, et al: An MR imaging procedure to measure tarsal bone rotation. .J Biomech Eng 2007. (in press).
Arndt A, Wolf P, Lui A, et al: Intrinsic foot kinematics measured in vivo during the stance phase of slow running. .J Biomech 40::2672. ,2007.
Cornwall MW, McPoil TG: Influence of rearfoot postural alignment on rearfoot motion during walking. .Foot 14::133. ,2004. .
Stacoff A., Reinschmidt C, Nigg BM, et al: Movement coupling at the ankle during the stance phase of running. .Foot Ankle Int 21::232. ,2000. .
Isman RE, Inman VT: Anthropometric studies of the human foot and ankle. .Bull Prosthet Res 11::97. ,1969. .
Root ML, Weed JH, Sgarlato TE, et al: Axis of motion of the subtalar joint. .JAPA 56::149. ,1966. .
Besl PJ, MCKay ND: A method for registration of 3-d shapes. .IEEE Trans Patt Anal Machine Intell ,14::239. ,1992. .
Background: The dependence of the movements of the calcaneus, cuboid, navicular, and talus on each other have been described as the tarsal gearbox. To provide a basis of its modeling, data on transmissions between tarsal joint rotations within this gearbox are required. The feasibility of tibiocalcaneal rotations to predict tarsal joint rotations is of interest because a meaningful relation would allow the use of common motion analysis with skin markers to investigate rearfoot kinematics.
Methods: We performed linear regression analyses between tarsal joint and tibiocalcaneal rotations on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging of tibia and tarsal bone positions during quasi-static foot pronation and supination.
Results: In the frontal plane and transverse planes, linear models were found to predict tarsal joint rotations quite well (r2 = 0.83–0.97 for the frontal plane and r2 = 0.73–0.95 for the transverse plane). For each degree of talocalcaneal rotation, there was 1.8° of talonavicular rotation in the frontal plane and 1.6° in the transverse plane; each degree of talocalcaneal rotation resulted in 0.6° of calcanealcuboid rotation in the frontal plane and 0.7° in the transverse plane; each degree of calcaneocuboid rotation resulted in 3° of talonavicular rotation in the frontal plane and 2.8° in the transverse; each degree of tibiocalcaneal rotation resulted in 0.9° of talocalcaneal rotation in the frontal plane and 0.9° in the transverse plane; and each degree of tibiocalcaneal rotation resulted in 1.6° of talonavicular rotation in the frontal plane and 1.3° in the transverse plane.
Conclusion: The present study provides a basis on which the tarsal gearbox in the frontal and the transverse planes under quasi-static conditions can be modeled. Furthermore, it is concluded that tibiocalcaneal rotations are practical for predicting tarsal joint rotations during quasi-static motions. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 98(1): 45–50, 2008)