• 1

    Rome K, Ashford RL, Evans A: Non-surgical interventions for paediatric pes planus. .Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007. ;(1):CD006311..

  • 2

    Sullivan JA: Pediatric flatfoot: evaluation and management. .J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7::44. ,1999. .

  • 3

    Staheli LT: Evaluation of planovalgus foot deformities with special reference to the natural history. .JAPMA 77::2. ,1987. .

  • 4

    Garcia-Rodriguez A, Martin-Jimenez F, Carnero-Varo M, et al: Flexible flat feet in children: a real problem?. Pediatrics 103::e84. ,1999. .

  • 5

    Pfeiffer M, Kotz R, Ledl T, et al: Prevalence of flat foot in preschool-aged children. .Pediatrics 118::634. ,2006. .

  • 6

    Staheli LT: Planovalgus foot deformity: current status. .JAPMA 89::94. ,1999. .

  • 7

    Aharonson Z, Arcan M, Steinback TV: Foot-ground pressure pattern of flexible flatfoot in children, with and without correction of calcaneovalgus. .Clin Orthop Relat Res 278::177. ,1992. .

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Harris EJ, Vanore JV, Thomas JL, et al: Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric flatfoot. .J Foot Ankle Surg 43::341. ,2004. .

  • 9

    Sackett DL: Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. .Chest 89::2. ,1986. .

  • 10

    Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al: Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM, Churchill Livingstone, Oxford, England. ,2000. .

  • 11

    Wenger DR, Mauldin D, Speck G, et al: Corrective shoes and inserts as treatment for flexible flatfoot in infants and children. .J Bone Joint Surg Am 71::800. ,1989. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Whitford D, Esterman A: A randomized controlled trial of two types of in-shoe orthoses in children with flexible excess pronation of the feet. .Foot Ankle Int 28::715. ,2007. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Evans AM: Relationship between “growing pains” and foot posture in children: single-case experimental designs in clinical practice. .JAPMA 93::111. ,2003. .

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Powell M, Seid M, Szer IS: Efficacy of custom foot orthoses in improving pain and functional status in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a randomized trial. .J Rheumatol 32::943. ,2005. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Redmond AC: The effectiveness of gait plates in controlling in-toeing symptoms in young children. .JAPMA 90::70. ,2000. .

  • 16

    Jay RM, Schoenhaus HD, Seymour C, et al: The Dynamic Stabilizing Innersole System (DSIS): the management of hyperpronation in children. .J Foot Ankle Surg 34::124. ,1995. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Penneau K, Lutter LD, Winter RB: Pes planus: radiographic changes with foot orthoses and shoes. .Foot Ankle 2::299. ,1982. .

  • 18

    Bordelon RL: Correction of hypermobile flatfoot in children by molded insert. .Foot Ankle 1::143. ,1980. .

  • 19

    Bleck EE, Berzins UJ: Conservative management of pes valgus with plantar flexed talus, flexible. .Clin Orthop Relat Res 122::85. ,1977. .

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Mereday C, Dolan CM, Lusskin R: Evaluation of the University of California Biomechanics Laboratory shoe insert in “flexible” pes planus. .Clin Orthop Relat Res 82::45. ,1972. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Camin M, Vangelista A, Cosentino A, et al: Early and delayed orthotic treatment in congenital metatarsus varus: effectiveness of two types of orthoses. .Eura Medicophys 40::285. ,2004. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Kilmartin TE, Wallace WA: The significance of pes planus in juvenile hallux valgus. .Foot Ankle 13::53. ,1992. .

  • 23

    Valmassy RL: “Biomechanical evaluation of the child,” in Clinical Biomechanics of the Lower Extremities, p 246, Mosby, St Louis. ,1996. .

  • 24

    Ganley JV: Podopediatrics: the past, present, and future challenge. .JAPMA 77::393. ,1987. .

  • 25

    Gould N, Moreland M, Alvarez R, et al: Development of the child’s arch. .Foot Ankle 9::241. ,1989. .

  • 26

    Evans AM: “The Flat Footed Child: To Treat or Not to Treat: What Is the Clinician to Do?” in Book of Abstracts: 22nd Australasian Podiatry Conference, May 8–12, 2007, p 15..

  • 27

    Evans AM, Scutter S: Sagittal plane range of motion of the pediatric ankle joint: a reliability study. .JAPMA 96::418. ,2006. .

  • 28

    Evans AM, Copper AW, Scharfbillig RW, et al: Reliability of the foot posture index and traditional measures of foot position. .JAPMA 93::203. ,2003. .

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Evans AM, Scutter SD, Iasiello H: Measuring the paediatric foot: a criterion validity and reliability study of navicular height in 4-year-old children. .The Foot 13::76. ,2003. .

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Portney LG, Watkins MP: Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, Prentice Hall Health, Upper Saddle River, NJ. ,2000. .

  • 31

    Ruta DA, Garratt AM, Leng M, et al: A new approach to the measurement of quality of life: the patient-generated index. .Med Care 32::1109. ,1994. .

  • 32

    Carr AJ, Higginson IJ: Are quality of life measures patient centred?. BMJ 322::1357. ,2001. .

  • 33

    Patel KK, Veenstra DL, Patrick DL: A review of selected patient-generated outcome measures and their application in clinical trials. .Value Health 6::595. ,2003. .

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Phillips P, Evans A: One pair must last a lifetime: foot care and diabetes. .Aust Fam Physician 31::259. ,2002. .

  • 35

    Evans AM, Phillips P: Traffic lights: a new, user-friendly classification structure for the diabetic foot. .Australas J Podiatr Med 32::133. ,1998. .

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

The Flat-Footed Child—To Treat or Not to Treat

What Is the Clinician to Do?

View More View Less
  • 1 Division of Health Sciences, Podiatry Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia 5000. (E-mail: angela.evans@unisa.edu.au)
Restricted access

Background: This article addresses the treatment of pediatric flatfoot with foot orthoses and explores the existing knowledge from an evidence-based perspective.

Methods: Studies investigating the use of foot orthoses for pediatric flatfoot were reviewed and ranked on the evidence hierarchy model according to research designs. Clinical guidelines and efficacy rating methods were also reviewed.

Results: Three randomized controlled trials exist, and a systematic review and possible meta-analysis of these studies is in progress. The results of these studies, although not definitive for the use of orthoses for pediatric flatfoot, provide useful direction. Clinical guidelines for the management of flatfoot are a useful supplement for clinical decision making and have been enhanced.

Conclusion: This article presents a pragmatic and evidence-based clinical care pathway for clinicians to use for pediatric flatfoot. It uses a simple “traffic light” framework to identify three subtypes of pediatric flatfoot. The clinician is advised to 1) treat symptomatic pediatric flatfoot, 2) monitor (or with discretion simply treat) asymptomatic nondevelopmental pediatric flatfoot, and 3) identify and advise asymptomatic developmental pediatric flatfoot. (Children with juvenile arthritis should receive customized foot orthoses.) This approach will dispel much of the contention surrounding the use of foot orthoses in children. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 98(5): 386–393, 2008)