Owings TM, Woerner JL, Frampton JD, et al: Custom therapeutic insoles based on both foot shape and plantar pressure measurement provide enhanced pressure relief. .Diabetes Care31::839. ,2008. .18252899)| false
Baumhauer JF, Wervey R, McWilliams J, et al: A comparison study of plantar foot pressure in a standardized shoe, total contact cast, and prefabricated pneumatic walking brace. .Foot Ankle Int18::26. ,1997. .
Baumhauer JF, Wervey R, McWilliams J, et al: A comparison study of plantar foot pressure in a standardized shoe, total contact cast, and prefabricated pneumatic walking brace. .Foot Ankle Int18::26. ,1997. .9013111)| false
Katz IA, Harlan A, Miranda-Palma B, et al: A randomized trial of two irremovable off-loading devices in the management of plantar neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. .Diabetes Care28::555. ,2005. .15735187)| false
Cavanagh PR, Ulbrecht JS: “What the Practicing Clinician Should Know About Foot Biomechanics,” in The Foot in Diabetes, 4th Ed, ed by AJ Boulton, PR Cavanagh, G Rayman, Wiley, Chichester, England. ,2006. .
Cavanagh PR, Ulbrecht JS: “What the Practicing Clinician Should Know About Foot Biomechanics,” in The Foot in Diabetes, 4th Ed, ed by AJ Boulton, PR Cavanagh, G Rayman, Wiley, Chichester, England. ,2006. .10.1002/0470029374.ch6)| false
1 Scholl’s Center for Lower Extremity Ambulatory Research (CLEAR) at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago, IL. Dr. Armstrong is now with University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ.
| 2 University Department of Medicine and Diabetes, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, England.
| 3 Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
Background: Off-loading excessive pressure is essential to healing diabetic foot ulcers. However, many patients are not compliant in using prescribed footwear or off-loading devices. We sought to validate a method of objectively measuring off-loading compliance via activity monitors.
Methods: For 4 days, a single subject maintained a written compliance diary concerning use of a removable cast walker. He also wore a hip-mounted activity monitor during all waking hours. An additional activity monitor remained mounted on the cast walker at all times. At the conclusion of the 4 days, the time-stamped hip activity data were independently coded for walker compliance by the compliance diary and by using the time-stamped walker activity data.
Results: An intraclass reliability of 0.93 was found between diary-coded and walker monitor–coded activity.
Conclusions: These results support the use of this dual activity monitor approach for assessing off-loading compliance. An advantage of this approach versus a patient-maintained diary is that the monitors are not susceptible to incorrect patient recall or a patient’s desire to please a caregiver by reporting inflated compliance. Furthermore, these results seem to lend support to existing reports in the literature using similar methods. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 99(2): 100–103, 2009)
Corresponding author: Ryan T. Crews, MS, Scholl’s Center for Lower Extremity Ambulatory Research (CLEAR), Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, 3333 Green Bay Rd, North Chicago, IL 60064. (E-mail: ryan.crews @rosalindfranklin.edu)