National Institutes of Health. Report of the National Diabetes Advisory Board, p 25, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. ,1980. . NIH publication 81:2284.
Gordois A, Scuffham P, Shearer A, et al: The health care cost of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the US. .Diabetes Care 26::1790. ,2003. .
Pecoraro RE, Reiber GE, Burgess EM: Causal pathways to amputation: basis for prevention. .Diabetes Care 13::513. ,1990. .
Brem H, Sheehan P, Boulton AJ: Protocol for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. .Am J Surg 187::1S. ,2004. .
Brigido SA: The use of an acellular dermal regenerative tissue matrix in the treatment of lower extremity wounds: a prospective 16 week pilot study. .Int Wound J 3::181. ,2006. .
Brigido SA, Boc SF, Lopez RC: Effective management of major lower extremity wounds using an acellular regenerative tissue matrix: a pilot study. .Orthopedics 27: (suppl):s145. ,2004. .
Ehrenreich M, Ruszczak Z: Tissue-engineered temporary wound coverings: important options for the clinician. .Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Panonica Adriat 15::5. ,2006. .
Niezgoda JA, Van Gils CC, Frykberg RG, et al: Randomized clinical trial comparing OASIS wound matrix to Regranex Gel for diabetic ulcers. .Adv Skin Wound Care 18::258. ,2005. .
Silverstein G: Dermal regeneration template in the surgical management of diabetic foot ulcers: a series of five cases. .J Foot Ankle Surg 45::28. ,2006. .
Stern R, McPherson M, Longaker M: Histological study of artificial skin used in treatment of full-thickness thermal injury. .J Burn Care Rehabil 11::7. ,1990. .
Veves A, Falanga V, Armstrong DG, et al: Graftskin, a human skin equivalent, is effective in the management of noninfected neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial. .Diabetes Care 24::290. ,2001. .
Fleischli JG, Fleischli JW: Preliminary results of a pilot study evaluating the use of a novel collagen wound dressing for the management of plantar neuropathic foot ulcers. Paper presented at: American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons Annual Scientific Meeting; March. 2007. ; Orlando, FL.
Gentzkow GD, Iwasaki SD, Hershon KS, et al: Use of Dermagraft, a cultured human dermis, to treat diabetic foot ulcers. .Diabetes Care 19::350. ,1996. .
Nataraj C, Ritter G, Dumas S, et al: Novel stabilization and sterilization method for collagen-based biologic wound dressings. .Wounds 19::148. ,2007. .
Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Vela SV, et al: Practical criteria for screening patients at high risk for diabetic foot ulceration. .Arch Intern Med 158::157. ,1998. .
Sheehan P, Jones P, Caselli A, et al: Percent change in wound area of diabetic foot ulcers over a 4-week period is a robust predictor of compete healing in a 12-week prospective trial. .Diabetes Care 26::1879. ,2003. .
Marston WA, Hanft J, Norwood P, et al: The efficacy and safety of Dermagraft in improving the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a prospective randomized trial. .Diabetes Care 26::1701. ,2003. .
Veves A, Sheehan P, Pham HT: A randomized, controlled trial of Promogran (a collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose dressing) vs standard treatment in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. .Arch Surg 137::822. ,2002. .
Mostow E, Haraway G, Dalsing M, et al: Effectiveness of an extracellular matrix graft (OASIS Wound Matrix) in the treatment of chronic leg ulcers: a randomized clinical trial. .J Vasc Surg 41::837. ,2005. .
Winters CL, Brigido SA, Liden BA, et al: A multicenter study involving the use of a human acellular dermal regenerative tissue matrix for the treatment of diabetic lower extremity wounds. .Adv Skin Wound Care 21::375. ,2008. .
Martin BR, Sangalang M, Wu S, et al: Outcomes of allogenic acellular matrix therapy in treatment of diabetic foot wounds: an initial experience. .Int Wound J 2::161. ,2005. .
Romanelli M, Dini V, Bertone M, et al: OASIS wound matrix versus Hyaloskin in the treatment of difficult-to-heal wounds of mixed arterial/venous aetiology. .Int Wound J 4::3. ,2007. .
Broden B: Roentgen examination of the subtaloid joint in fractures of the calcaneus. .Acta Radiol 31::85. ,1949. .
Blume PA, Walters J, Payne W, et al: Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. .Diabetes Care 31::631. ,2008. .
Sackheim K, De Araujo TS, Kirsner RS: Compression modalities and dressings: their use in venous ulcers. .Dermatol Ther 19::338. ,2006. .
Background: Treatment of diabetic foot wounds remains a major health-care issue, with diabetic foot ulcers representing the most common causal pathway to lower-extremity amputation. Although several investigations have examined topical collagen-based dressings, none have specifically looked at equine pericardium. We, therefore, evaluated the effect of the equine pericardium dressing on neuropathic foot wounds.
Methods: Twenty-three consecutive patients with 34 neuropathic foot wounds were evaluated as part of a pilot study. An equine pericardium dressing was applied in a standard manner, and the patients followed a standard postapplication treatment protocol. Changes in wound size were recorded when the equine dressing was removed and 4 and 12 weeks after application. Patients underwent dressing changes every 3 to 4 days until healed or for 12 weeks.
Results: Thirty-two wounds in 22 patients were prospectively available for evaluation. On enrollment, the median wound size was 299 mm2. When the equine material was removed (mean, 2.9 weeks), 30 of the wounds (94%) had improved, with a median size of 115 mm2 and an average reduction in size of 44.3% (P < .0001). At 4 weeks, the average decrease in wound size was 52.3% (P < .0001). At 12 weeks, 15 wounds (47%) had healed.
Conclusions: This first report of equine pericardium used to treat neuropathic foot ulcerations demonstrates that the equine pericardium dressing is a safe and beneficial treatment for neuropathic wounds. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 99(4): 301–305, 2009)