Is Bone Morphology a Determinative Risk Factor for the Type of Ankle Fracture?

Sefa Giray BatıbayDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara Work Related and Enviromental Disease Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Sefa Giray Batıbay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Serkan BayramDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Siverek State Hospital, Şanlıurfa, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Serkan Bayram in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
, and
Ömer PolatDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Umraniye Education and Research Hospital, Instanbul, Turkey.

Search for other papers by Ömer Polat in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
Restricted access

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the radiographic bone morphology of the ankle and the observed fracture type.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the patients who had visited our emergency department with ankle injuries between June 2012 and July 2018. All patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Patients were categorized in two groups based on the fracture patterns (groups 1 and 2). Group 1 consisted of isolated lateral malleolar fractures, while group 2 comprised bimalleolar fractures. Group 1 was further divided into two groups; namely group A and B based on their classification into Weber type B and C fractures, respectively. Four radiographic parameters were measured postoperatively by standing whole-leg anteroposterior view of the ankle; talocrural angle (TCA), medial malleolar relative length (MMRL), lateral malleolar relative length (LMRL), and the distance between the talar dome and distal fibula.

Results: One hundred and seventeen patients were included in group 1-A, 89 patients in group 1-B, and 168 patients in group 2. The values of TCA and MMRL were significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1. Lateral malleolar length/medial malleolar length ratio was also significantly different between the two groups. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of LMRL and the distance between the tip of the distal fibula and talar process. LMLR and MMRL values between groups A and B were not significantly different (p=0.402 and p=0.592, respectively). However, there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of TCA and the distance between the tip of the distal fibula and talar process.

Conclusions: The talocrural angle, medial malleolar relative length, and lateral malleolar length/medial malleolar length were significantly higher in patients with bimalleolar fracture than in patients with isolated lateral malleolar fractures.

Corresponding author: Serkan Bayram, MD, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Siverek State Hospital, Ediz, Şanlıurfa Diyarbakır Yolu 8. Km, 63600, Siverek Şanlıurfa, Turkey, 63614. (E-mail: dr.serkanbayram89@gmail.com)