Background: One of the common causes of posterior ankle pain is posterior ankle impingement syndrome (PAIS). Many studies about PAIS have been conducted on special groups such as athletes, dancers, and football players, whereas there has been no previous study of a non-athletic population. This study aimed to evaluate the causes and treatment methods of this syndrome in the non-athletic population and compare it with the athletic population.
Methods: A retrospective review was done and 28 of 46 patients (60.9%) recovered from two-staged conservative therapy. 18 of 46 patients (39.1%) who did not benefit from conservative treatment for three months, hindfoot endoscopy was applied. Patient data, including sex, age, occupation, and sports activity level, were recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, and Tegner score were recorded. Patient satisfaction was assessed with a 4-point Likert scale. All complications were recorded.
Results: The mean follow-up period was 27.4 months. At the final follow-up examination, the AOFAS hindfoot score had significantly improved from 66.4 to 96.8 (p<0.001). The Tegner activity score improved significantly from 4.6 to 8.8 (p<0.001). The VAS score was 6.4 and increased to 0.9 (p<0.001). Using the 4-point Likert Scale for patient satisfaction, 13 (72.2%) stated that the surgical procedure was excellent, and 4 (27.8%) stated it as good. The mean time to return to work was 4.2 weeks. As complications, only sural nerve dysesthesia was seen in 2 patients(11.1%).
Conclusions: This study can be considered of value as the first study to have evaluated PAIS in the non-athletic population. Conservative treatment showed good results as nearly two-thirds of the patients recovered. Hindfoot endoscopy applied to cases not responding to conservative therapy is a successful treatment with low complication rates.
Osteonecrosis is acknowledged as a relatively uncommon disorder caused by various factors, including autoimmune diseases, drug-induced diseases, inherited metabolic disorders, coagulation disorders, and underlying malignancies. To our knowledge, no previous research has investigated osteonecrosis stemming from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Herein, we report a rare case of postperipheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation–induced multifocal osteonecrosis in the foot and ankle that demonstrated a low serpiginous peripheral signal on T1-weighted images and a double-line sign on fat-suppressed or T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. Conservative treatment was applied, and the patient was mostly recuperated after 6 months.
Background: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) was first introduced into clinical practice in 1982 and has been a beneficial inclusion to the non-invasive treatment option of numerous orthopaedic pathologies. However, clinical evidence of the use of ESWT for various foot and ankle disorders has been limited with a consensus on its efficacy yet available. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature, to provide a critical evaluation and meta-analysis for the use of ESWT in foot and ankle disorders.
Methods: The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically reviewed and clinical studies that reported ESWT use for various foot and ankle disorders included.
Results: A total of 24 clinical studies that included 12 randomized controlled trials and 12 case series were identified. Analysis of the evidence has indicated that ESWT can help manage plantar fasciitis, calcaneal spur, Achilles tendinopathy and Morton’s neuroma. Meta-analysis of the change in pre-to post-VAS overall scores for plantar fasciitis significantly favored ESWT compared to placebo/conservative treatment with a MD-3.10(95%Cl, -4.36 to -1.83; l2=68%; P<0.00001).
Conclusions: The current evidence has suggested that ESWT can provide symptomatic benefit to plantar fasciitis treatment, with minimal and unremarkable side effects. Overall, ESWT has been demonstrated to be safe treatment option with a favorable complication profile. Further well-designed studies of ESWT for the treatment of calcaneal spurs, Achilles tendinopathy and Morton’s neuroma are warranted to more soundly and safely support its current use. Future studies are suggested to investigate the optimization of ESWT treatment protocols.
Background: Although tarsal coalition represents the most common cause of peroneal spastic flatfoot, its existence cannot be verified in several cases. In some patients with rigid flatfoot, no cause can be detected after clinical, laboratory, and radiologic examination, and the condition is called idiopathic peroneal spastic flatfoot (IPSF). This study aimed to present our experience with surgical management and outcomes in patients with IPSF.
Methods: Seven patients with an IPSF, who were operated on between 2016 and 2019, and followed for at least 12 months were included, whereas those with known etiologies, such as tarsal coalition or other etiologies (traumatic, etc.) were excluded. All patients were followed up for 3 months with botulinum toxin injection and cast immobilization as a routine protocol, and clinical improvement was not achieved. The Evans procedure and grafting with tricortical iliac crest bone graft in 5 patients and subtalar arthrodesis in 2 patients were performed. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale scores (AOFAS) and Foot & Ankle Disability Index (FADI) scores were obtained pre- and postoperatively from all patients.
Results: In physical examination, all feet manifested by rigid pes planus with varying degrees of hindfoot valgus and limited subtalar motion. Overall, the mean AOFAS and FADI scores significantly increased from 42 (range = 20-76) and 45 (range, 19-68) preoperatively (p = 0.018) to 85 (range = 67-97) and 84 (range, 67-99) (p = 0.043) at the final follow-up, respectively. No major intra- or post-operative complications were observed in any of the patients. All CT and MRI scans revealed no evidence of tarsal coalitions in any of the feet. All radiological workups failed to demonstrate secondary signs of fibrous or cartilaginous coalitions.
Conclusion: Operative treatment seems to be a good option in the treatment of patients with IPSF who do not benefit from conservative treatment. In the future, it is recommended to investigate the ideal treatment options for this group of patients.