Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 8 of 8 items for
- Author or Editor: Ryan Stone x
- Refine by access: All Content x
Background: Resident-run clinics provide autonomy and skill development for resident physicians. Many residency programs have such a clinic. No study has been performed investigating the effectiveness of these clinics in podiatric medical residency training. The purpose of this study was to gauge the resident physician–perceived benefit of such a clinic.
Methods: A survey examining aspects of a resident-run clinic and resident clinical performance was distributed to all Doctor of Podiatric Medicine residency programs recognized by the Council on Podiatric Medical Education. To be included, a program must have had a contact e-mail listed in the Central Application Service for Podiatric Residencies residency contact directory; 208 residency programs met the criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using independent-samples t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests and χ2 tests. Significance was set a priori at P < .05.
Results: Of 97 residents included, 58 (59.79%) had a resident-run clinic. Of those, 89.66% of residents stated they liked having such a clinic, and 53.85% of those without a resident-run clinic stated they would like to have one. No statistically significant differences were noted between groups in how many patients each resident felt they could manage per hour or regarding their level of confidence in the following clinical scenarios: billing, coding, writing a note, placing orders, conversing with a patient, working with staff, diagnosing and treating basic pathology, and diagnosing and treating unique pathology.
Conclusions: Resident-run clinics provide autonomy and skill development for podiatric medical residents. This preliminary study found there was no difference in resident-perceived benefit of such a clinic. Further research is needed to understand the utility of a resident-run clinic in podiatric medical residency training.
Background: First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis with isolated dorsal plating without a lag screw and without a compressive mechanism incorporated into the plate is not well studied. Although surface area for bony fusion is increased, there is concern for lower fusion rates and progressive loss of sagittal plane positioning. We present fusion rates and progressive sagittal plane deviation with isolated dorsal plate fixation.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 41 patients (43 feet) who underwent first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis with isolated dorsal plate fixation. Patients were excluded if another form of fixation was used, if there was a compressive feature to the dorsal plate, or if a lag screw was used. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final postoperative radiographs were reviewed to assess radiographic alignment and fusion about the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Specific attention was placed on hallux dorsiflexion in relation to the first metatarsal. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ .05 a priori.
Results: Patients were followed for an average of 55.7 weeks. Overall union rate was 97.62%. The average time to union was 42.55 days. Reoperation rate was 4.65%, with one patient requiring revisional arthrodesis with a lag screw construct. Hallux abduction and first-second intermetatarsal angle correction reached significance (P < .00001). Hallux dorsiflexion increased by 1.05° between initial postoperative and final postoperative radiographs (P = .542).
Conclusions: Although fusion rates and progressive loss of sagittal plane position have been concerns for first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis with an isolated dorsal plate construct, these results suggest this to be a stable construct without loss of positioning over time.
