Muller S, Carlsohn A, Muller J, et al: Static and dynamic foot characteristics in children aged 1-13 years: a cross-sectional study. Gait Posture35: 389, 2012.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.10.35722118730)| false
Teyhen DS, Stoltenberg BE, Collinsworth KM, et al. Dynamic plantar pressure parameters associated with static arch height index during gait. Clin Biomech24: 391, 2009.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.01.006)| false
Gurney JK, Kersting UG, Rosenbaum D: Between-day reliability of repeated plantar pressure distribution measurements in a normal population. Gait Posture27: 706, 2008.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.002)| false
Akins JS, Keenan KA, Sell TC, et al: Test-retest reliability and descriptive statistics of geometric measurements based on plantar pressure measurements in a healthy population during gait. Gait Posture35: 167, 2012.
Akins JS, Keenan KA, Sell TC, et al: Test-retest reliability and descriptive statistics of geometric measurements based on plantar pressure measurements in a healthy population during gait. Gait Posture35: 167, 2012.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.08.007)| false
Taisa Filippin N, de Almeida Bacarin T, Lobo da Costa PH. Comparison of static footprints and pedobarography in obese and non-obese children. Foot Ankle Int29: 1141, 2008.10.3113/FAI.2008.114119026210)| false
Stavlas P, Grivas TB, Michas C, et al: The evolution of foot morphology in children between 6 and 17 years of age: a cross-sectional study based on footprints in a Mediterranean population. J Foot Ankle Surg44: 424, 2005.
Stavlas P, Grivas TB, Michas C, et al: The evolution of foot morphology in children between 6 and 17 years of age: a cross-sectional study based on footprints in a Mediterranean population. J Foot Ankle Surg44: 424, 2005.10.1053/j.jfas.2005.07.023)| false
Fourchet F, Kelly L, Horobeanu C, et al: High-intensity running and plantar-flexor fatigability and plantar-pressure distribution in adolescent runners. J Athl Train50: 117, 2015.2553114310.4085/1062-6050-49.3.90)| false
Hollander K, van der Zwaard BC, de Villiers JE, et al: The effects of being habitually barefoot on foot mechanics and motor performance in children and adolescents aged 6-18 years: study protocol for a multicenter cross-sectional study (Barefoot LIFE project). J Foot Ankle Res9: 36, 2016.
Hollander K, van der Zwaard BC, de Villiers JE, et al: The effects of being habitually barefoot on foot mechanics and motor performance in children and adolescents aged 6-18 years: study protocol for a multicenter cross-sectional study (Barefoot LIFE project). J Foot Ankle Res9: 36, 2016.10.1186/s13047-016-0166-127594919)| false
Mudie KL, Gupta A, Green S, et al: Adaptation of lower limb movement patterns when maintaining performance in the presence of muscle fatigue. Hum Mov Sci48: 28, 2016.2710156210.1016/j.humov.2016.04.003)| false
Hollander K, Argubi-Wollesen A, Reer R, et al: Comparison of minimalist footwear strategies for simulating barefoot running: a randomized crossover study. PloS One10: e0125880, 2015.10.1371/journal.pone.012588026011042)| false
Hollander K, Heidt C, van der Zwaard B, et al: Long-term effects of habitual barefoot running and walking: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc49: 752, 2017.10.1249/MSS.000000000000114127801744)| false
Pau M, Leban B, Corona F, et al: School-based screening of plantar pressures during level walking with a backpack among overweight and obese schoolchildren. Ergonomics59: 697, 2016.2622604510.1080/00140139.2015.1077275)| false
Measurement of the medial longitudinal foot arch in children is a controversial topic, as there are many different methods without a definite standard procedure. The purpose of this study was to 1) investigate intraday and interrater reliability regarding dynamic arch index and static arch height, 2) explore the correlation between both arch indices, and 3) examine the variation of the medial longitudinal arch at two different times of the day.
Eighty-six children (mean ± SD age, 8.9 ± 1.9 years) participated in the study. Dynamic footprint data were captured with a pedobarographic platform. For static arch measurements, a specially constructed caliper was used to assess heel-to-toe length and dorsum height. A mixed model was established to determine reliability and variation.
Reliability was found to be excellent for the static arch height index in sitting (intraday, 0.90; interrater, 0.80) and standing positions (0.88 and 0.85) and for the dynamic arch index (both 1.00). There was poor correlation between static and dynamic assessment of the medial longitudinal arch (standing dynamic arch index, r = –0.138; sitting dynamic arch index, r = –0.070). Static measurements were found to be significantly influenced by the time of day (P < .001), whereas the dynamic arch index was unchanged (P = .845). This study revealed some further important findings. The static arch height index is influenced by gender (P = .004), whereas dynamic arch index is influenced by side (P = .011) and body mass index (P < .001).
Dynamic and static foot measurements are reliable for medial longitudinal foot arch assessment in children. The variation of static arch measurements during the day has to be kept in mind. For clinical purposes, static and dynamic arch data should be interpreted separately.
Corresponding author: Karsten Hollander, MD, Department of Sports and Exercise Medicine, Institute of Human Movement Science, University of Hamburg, Turmweg 2, Hamburg 20148, Germany. (E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org)