Advertisement
Comparison of Suture Types and Techniques in Achilles Tendon Repair: An Ex Vivo Biomechanical Animal Experiment
Search for other papers by Fatih Dogar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kaan Gurbuz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Duran Topak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mustafa Abdullah Ozdemir in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Burak Kuşçu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yakup Ekinci in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sabri Batin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hakan Yaykasli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Okkes Bilal in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Background: Ideal suture technique and type in tendon repair are remain unclear. This biomechanical study aimed to assess the biomechanical characteristics of three techniques, modified Kessler (mKE), modified Krackow (mKR), and modified tension Bunnell (mtBU), in sheep Achilles’ tendon tear repair using three suture types, polypropylene, polyester, and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) sutures, which are also compared.
Methods: Sixty-three Achilles’ tendons harvested from sheep were transversely hacked as a replacement for rupture in a standardized measure and repaired using mKE, mKR, and mtBU techniques with No. 2 polypropylene, polyester, and UHMWPE sutures. Biomechanical parameters, such as Young’s modulus, ultimate strength, and strength to the 5-mm gap were recorded for statistical analysis.
Results: The mtBU technique with UHMWPE use resulted in increased ultimate strength, strenght to 5-mm gap, Young’s modulus, and quantity of specimens with low clinical failure modes compared to other techniques with other suture materials. Furthermore, mtBU has the lowest thickness at the repair side of the tendons. This approach showed tendon failure during maximal traction testing, whereas the mKE and mKR had polyethylene and polyester suture failures.
Conclusions: The UHMWPE suture was significantly superior to the other sutures in each suture techniques in terms of strength and durability. The mtBU technique using UHMWPE suture showed better biomechanical results, implying that this repair might be more appropriate to obtain early mobilization after tendon ruptures.
